Sass and LESS Preprocessors

Web builders must be acquainted with one or each preprocessors

Sass is based totally in Ruby and calls for a Ruby installation. This is no big deal if you have a Mac. However, it's far a longer installation when you have a Windows gadget.

LESS turned into constructed in Ruby, like Sass, however it has been ported to JavaScript. To use LESS, you ought to upload the relevant JavaScript documents to your server or bring together the CSS sheets through an offline compiler.

To Assign Variables, Sass Uses '$' While LESS Uses '@'

two male CSS programmers sitting in front of a laptop and desktop monitor in an office

Both Sass and LESS use specialized characters to assign variables. This is a part of the advantage of using those preprocessors. You don’t need to preserve entering specs every time you need to assign variables. Instead, you can simply enter the individual.

In Sass, it’s the dollar sign ($). In LESS, it’s the "at" image (@). The best downside for LESS is that there are a few existing CSS selectors that already use @. That trouble could stiffen the gaining knowledge of curve a bit.

Sass Has Compass While LESS Has Preboot

group of web programmers sitting with laptops, one laptop displaying lines of code

Sass and LESS have extensions to be had to combine mixins (the capability to save and percentage CSS declarations for the duration of a domain).

Sass uses Compass for mixins, which incorporates every option to be had with updates for future guide.

LESS has Preboot.less, LESS Mixins, LESS Elements, gs, and Frameless. LESS’s software program guide is more fragmented than Sass, resulting in a variety of distinctive options for extensions that may not all characteristic the identical manner. For your mission, you may want to use more than one (or all) of the listed extensions to replicate the performance of Compass.

LESS Has Better Error Messages Than Sass

compter programmer looking through lines of code

Both Sass and LESS have been examined for his or her potential to file mistakes in syntax. LESS has greater accurate mistakes messages in the checks—it said the precise vicinity of the mistake. This can are available accessible when a typo is derailing the code. LESS mistakes messages will let you fast discover the problem.

LESS Has More User-Friendly Documentation Than Sass

web programmer sitting in front of laptop in a coffee shop

The LESS documentation is visually attractive and less complicated to comply with for first-time users. The Sass documentation calls for both an awful lot greater of base knowledge, or frequent pass-references with a wiki at some stage in setup.​​

This fact in and of itself may want to weigh heavily on the adoption charges of both Sass or LESS.